Winton Strauss Law Group, P.C.

Call Us for Extraordinary Legal Representation!415-800-1551

  • David is an experienced attorney who exhibits professionalism, integrity and a practical cost-benefit approach to business litigation. He assisted me under very difficult circumstances and led us to a successful outcome...    Read more

  • I have had the pleasure of knowing and working with Jay Strauss for more than 20 years. More than a great lawyer, he is a great counselor. As a counselor, Jay applies the business wisdom he has acquired over the years as a business advocate, litigator and advisor to the legal challenges and opportunities of small, medium and large corporations.... Read more

  • David Winton is someone who is committed to getting his clients results. He cares about his clients and makes it easy to understand the next steps no matter what you are tackling. He takes the sometimes complicated legislative system and brings clarity to it..   Read more

  • I was 79 year old employee of a Steamship Agency, when my employer unjustly terminated me after twenty five plus years of commendable service... Read more

  • David is probably the smartest (and most effective) attorney that I know in the Bay Area...and the results that he provides for my clients have reflected this. avid has a unique ability to cut through ...  Read more

  • Let it be known that Jay Strauss saved me and my family.I had an unusual incident with a major company in the garment industry, such that I suffered a debilitating breakdown which took nearly a year to recover from. Obviously, without income for that period of time, it was extremely difficult to survive financially... Read more

  • David has worked for and with me to find a resolution to a very difficult business issue we have recently had to address. He was able to bring about the exact results we had discussed prior to engaging in the work... Read more

  • I am writing this letter to congratulate you on a masterful representation of the Petersons.Your exchange with [the Bank of America Manager] and summation deserved audible acclaim... Read more

U.S. Supreme Court hears important employment retaliation case

For the most part, private companies have a lot of leeway when it comes to the reasons behind their hiring, firing and demotion decisions. The public sector, however, is different. Government employees are generally protected from employment retaliation when exercising their constitutional rights to free speech and association. But a case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court could put that protection to the test.

The civil servant at the heart of this case is a now-retired police officer named Jeffrey Heffernan. In 2006, he had recently been promoted to detective after working as a police officer for 20 years in Paterson, New Jersey. There was an upcoming mayoral election that year, and Heffernan's mother supported the candidate running against the incumbent mayor. The yard sign showing her support had recently been stolen, so she asked her son to get her a new one.

After work one day, Heffernan went to the candidate's campaign headquarters and picked up a new sign. Someone saw him there holding the sign and speaking to some staffers. A short time later, he got a phone call. He was being demoted, the caller said, because the (incumbent) mayor "calls the shots" and wanted him out.

Heffernan was not politically affiliated. In fact, he couldn't even vote in that election because he didn't live in Paterson. Nonetheless, his demotion was permanent, along with the pay cut and loss of perks that came with it. Heffernan sued the city, alleging that his First Amendment rights had been violated.

His lawsuit was originally successful, until the presiding judge decided to recuse himself. When the case was retried, it was dismissed by a judge. That decision was upheld by a federal appellate court. Both courts held that Heffernan's free speech rights had not been violated because he hadn't actually been campaigning for the mayor's opponent. In short, his rights couldn't have been violated because they were not being exercised.

That line of reasoning leads to some obvious and troubling questions. As just one example: Should it matter that he was not campaigning? The retaliation was based on the perception that he was openly supporting the mayor's opponent, which would have been protected free speech. If a woman had been fired because her boss mistakenly thought she was pregnant, wouldn't that nonetheless be an illegal case of pregnancy discrimination?

Thankfully, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. No matter how the Court rules, it could have big implications for the most fundamental rights of government employees.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Legal Problems? We Can Help

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy